← New Search ↗ Social Card

William-Charles Bishop Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cornwall Colts CCHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0362 0.0362 0.1290 0.1290
2020-21 Cornwall Colts CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 52 2 6 8 0.154 0.0756 0.0794 0.4107 0.4311
2022-23 QMJHL 64 1 8 9 0.141 0.0691 0.0692 0.3754 0.3757
2023-24 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 33 0 3 3 0.091 0.0447 0.0425 0.2427 0.2309
2024-25 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 64 8 35 43 0.672 0.3301 0.2979 1.7942 1.6190
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Clarkson D1 ECAC 31 1 4 5 0.161
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2025-26 · Clarkson
-12.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8209
Defenseman overall
#1886
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2012-13
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2008-09
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.