IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Brisson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-22 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 65 9 14 23 0.354 0.1738 0.1950 0.9445 1.0597
2023-24 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 67 13 23 36 0.537 0.2640 0.2832 1.4344 1.5386
2024-25 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 62 24 48 72 1.161 0.5705 0.5839 3.1002 3.1730
2025-26 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 50 20 44 64 1.280 0.6289 0.6140 3.4171 3.3359
2026-27 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 6 2 7 9 1.500 0.7369 0.7369 4.0044 4.0044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5307
Forward overall
#114
Forward born in 2006
#171
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Drew Stewart
USHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.