← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Lecompte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-19 Country: Canada
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 61 15 18 33 0.541 0.2658 0.2894 1.4446 1.5731
2024-25 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 56 14 35 49 0.875 0.4299 0.4470 2.3365 2.4295
2025-26 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 61 27 36 63 1.033 0.5074 0.5036 2.7579 2.7372
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8065
Forward overall
#163
Forward born in 2007
#299
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
BCHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2023-24
0.08
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2017-18
0.07
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.