← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Lecompte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-19 Country: Canada
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 61 15 18 33 0.541 0.2658 0.2894 1.4443 1.5728
2024-25 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 56 14 35 49 0.875 0.4299 0.4470 2.3359 2.4288
2025-26 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 61 27 36 63 1.033 0.5074 0.5036 2.7572 2.7365
2026-27 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 6 3 4 7 1.167 0.5732 0.5732 3.1146 3.1146
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8207
Forward overall
#171
Forward born in 2007
#307
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2013-14
0.22
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2024-25
0.19
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2024-25
0.72
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
QMJHL 2023-24
0.94
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.