IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jiří Klíma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-17 Country: Czechia
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Mountfield HK U20 USHL-Style-Czech 5 2 1 3 0.600 0.1853 0.2096 0.6408 0.7250
2022-23 Mountfield HK U20 USHL-Style-Czech 42 7 5 12 0.286 0.0882 0.0954 0.3051 0.3300
2023-24 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 54 18 13 31 0.574 0.2821 0.2953 1.5330 1.6047
2024-25 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 64 15 25 40 0.625 0.3071 0.3064 1.6689 1.6650
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 50 28 24 52 1.040 0.5110 0.4856 2.7771 2.6392
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9561
Forward overall
#315
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dill
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.