IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Wuthrich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-11 Country: USA
2012 · Round 4, Pick #107  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 25 2 3 5 0.200 0.1487 0.1540 0.7463 0.7727
2010-11 — NTDP-U18 20 3 5 8 0.400 0.2973 0.2951 1.4926 1.4817
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 37 10 7 17 0.460
2013-14 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 40 6 7 13 0.325
2012-13 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig SO 33 5 4 9 0.273
2011-12 Notre Dame D1 CCHA-orig FR 36 7 10 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2011-12 · Notre Dame
+131.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20492
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ryan Galt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Hudson Fasching
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joel L'Esperance
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Salerno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Caron
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.