← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Laberge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-10-09 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 5, Pick #135  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 QMJHL 65 4 20 24 0.369 0.1814 0.1950 0.9859 1.0598
2024-25 Acadie-Bathurst Titan QMJHL 63 12 23 35 0.556 0.2730 0.2801 1.4836 1.5219
2025-26 Newfoundland Regiment QMJHL 62 7 49 56 0.903 0.4437 0.4342 2.4118 2.3600
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2707
Defenseman overall
#526
Defenseman born in 2006
#483
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.07
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2015-16
0.61
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
AJHL 2023-24
0.28
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2018-19
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.