← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Kilfoil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-21 Country: Canada
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 6 9 15 0.536 0.1061 0.1061 0.2441 0.2441
2023-24 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 62 9 11 20 0.323 0.1585 0.1739 0.8614 0.9452
2024-25 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 62 21 25 46 0.742 0.3645 0.3820 1.9811 2.0765
2025-26 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 56 14 25 39 0.696 0.3421 0.3424 1.8596 1.8612
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15436
Forward overall
#426
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2012-13
0.63
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2023-24
0.19
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2012-13
0.22
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.