← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Carrier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-14 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 7, Pick #195  ·  Colorado Avalanche Colorado Avalanche
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 59 8 3 11 0.186 0.0916 0.1004 0.4976 0.5455
2024-25 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 59 18 26 44 0.746 0.3664 0.3837 1.9910 2.0850
2025-26 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 61 37 28 65 1.066 0.5235 0.5234 2.8447 2.8444
2026-27 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 3 3 1 4 1.333 0.6551 0.6551 3.5594 3.5594
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10777
Forward overall
#275
Forward born in 2007
#408
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2017-18
0.41
actual FR PPG at Boston University
OHL 2015-16
0.16
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2020-21
0.33
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.