← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathias Loiselle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-18 Country: Canada
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Québec Remparts QMJHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0983 0.1009 0.5341 0.5481
2024-25 Québec Remparts QMJHL 63 9 9 18 0.286 0.1404 0.1372 0.7629 0.7454
2025-26 Québec Remparts QMJHL 37 8 15 23 0.622 0.3054 0.2840 1.6599 1.5434
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27482
Forward overall
#1586
Forward born in 2005
#826
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USPHL-Premier-Classic 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
USHL 2016-17
0.33
actual FR PPG at Vermont
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
1.655 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.