IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Steenerson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Maple Grove USHS-MN 31 9 7 16 0.516 0.0653 0.0653 0.1254 0.1254
2022-23 Minot Minotauros NAHL 11 1 3 4 0.364 0.1336 0.1461 0.3838 0.4197
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 47 5 10 15 0.319 0.1882 0.1882 0.9584 0.9585
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 32 4 5 9 0.281
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 32 5 8 13 0.406
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2024-25 · Vermont
+176.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23919
Forward overall
#1348
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Catanzaro
SUNY Cortland · 2001-02
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.