← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Steenerson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-29 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Maple Grove USHS-MN 31 9 7 16 0.516 0.1389 0.1389 0.1254 0.1254
2022-23 Minot Minotauros NAHL 11 1 3 4 0.364 0.1441 0.1576 0.3817 0.4174
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 47 5 10 15 0.319 0.1962 0.1962 0.9401 0.9402
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 32 4 5 9 0.281
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 32 5 8 13 0.406
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2024-25 · Vermont
+162.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23828
Forward overall
#1340
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2019-20
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.