IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivier Duhamel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-11-22 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 20 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 39 4 5 9 0.231 0.1134 0.1227 0.6163 0.6667
2025-26 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 58 5 21 26 0.448 0.2202 0.2278 1.1971 1.2385
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12316
Defenseman overall
#1629
Defenseman born in 2007
#1172
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Will Butcher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matthew Mayich
OHL 2022-23
0.44
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Tristan Sarsland
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.19
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Carter Rose
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Jack Sparkes
OJHL 2021-22
0.13
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Vadim Kiryakov
Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2014-15
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.