← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Rose Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Holderness NE-Prep 27 1 11 12 0.444 0.0880 0.0880 0.2025 0.2025
2019-20 Holderness NE-Prep 28 4 17 21 0.750 0.1486 0.1486 0.3417 0.3417
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0357 0.0357 0.1820 0.1820
2021-22 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 55 1 11 12 0.218 0.1287 0.1243 0.6553 0.6328
2022-23 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 7 8 15 0.242 0.1427 0.1304 0.7265 0.6638
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC JR 37 2 8 10 0.270
2024-25 Clarkson D1 ECAC 25 0 2 2 0.080
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC 15 1 0 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · Clarkson
-44.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14407
Defenseman overall
#2701
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2004-05
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.