IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zackary Sandhu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Guelph Storm OHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0579 0.0650 0.2618 0.2940
2022-23 Guelph Storm OHL 45 2 4 6 0.133 0.0771 0.0833 0.3490 0.3769
2023-24 Oshawa Generals OHL 59 3 7 10 0.170 0.0981 0.1012 0.4438 0.4580
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 64 9 15 24 0.375 0.2169 0.2126 0.9819 0.9626
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 64 3 16 19 0.297 0.1718 0.1598 0.7774 0.7230
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9117
Defenseman overall
#2014
Defenseman born in 2005
#1169
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jory Mullin
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin MacLellan
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.