← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon-Xavier Cyr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-11 Country: Canada
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 43 2 7 9 0.209 0.1028 0.1128 0.5587 0.6128
2025-26 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 64 9 13 22 0.344 0.1689 0.1773 0.9178 0.9633
2026-27 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 5 3 1 4 0.800 0.3930 0.3930 2.1357 2.1357
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38860
Forward overall
#751
Forward born in 2008
#1159
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.83
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
AJHL 2022-23
0.12
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
BCHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
AJHL 2015-16
0.08
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2021-22
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.