IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon-Xavier Cyr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-11 Country: Canada
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 43 2 7 9 0.209 0.1028 0.1128 0.5589 0.6130
2025-26 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 64 9 13 22 0.344 0.1689 0.1773 0.9180 0.9635
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38362
Forward overall
#667
Forward born in 2008
#1144
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Alex Talcott
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Wiitala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Callin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Bentley (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Caden Cranston
USPHL-Premier 2021-22
0.49
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Ben Yurchuk
NAHL 2022-23
0.15
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
David Sacco
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.11
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Daniel Astapovich
USHL 2022-23
0.27
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Regen Cavanagh
Utica · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2002-03
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.