← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Olsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Toronto · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0958 0.1011 0.2644 0.2791
2015-16 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 58 32 49 81 1.397 0.4684 0.4727 1.2924 1.3041
2016-17 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 58 22 25 47 0.810 0.2718 0.2610 0.7499 0.7202
2017-18 AJHL 52 28 33 61 1.173 0.3935 0.3558 1.0856 0.9815
2019-20 Univ. of Toronto USports-M 27 6 9 15 0.556 0.2931 0.2931 1.6285 1.6285
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 12 1 0 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2018-19 · Merrimack
-69.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14131
Forward overall
#637
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2023-24
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.