← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Delarosbil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-06-18 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 7 1 4 5 0.714 0.3509 0.3897 1.9069 2.1175
2025-26 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 60 8 14 22 0.367 0.1802 0.1916 0.9789 1.0407
2026-27 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 6 1 3 4 0.667 0.3275 0.3275 1.7798 1.7798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8304
Defenseman overall
#578
Defenseman born in 2008
#952
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHL 2012-13
0.64
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
SHL-J20 2020-21
0.13
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
AJHL 2017-18
0.39
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.