IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Delarosbil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-06-18 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 7 1 4 5 0.714 0.3509 0.3897 1.9074 2.1180
2025-26 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 60 8 14 22 0.367 0.1802 0.1916 0.9792 1.0410
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8185
Defenseman overall
#498
Defenseman born in 2008
#939
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Isaiah Norlin
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.06
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
Victor Mancini
SHL-J20 2019-20
0.13
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
Davis Pennington
NAHL 2018-19
0.23
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
Dean Stewart
MJHL 2015-16
0.24
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Merrell
University of New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Aiello
UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.