Stevenson
Set Commitment
NCAA Division I Women's
Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.06
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0682
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
NCAA D3W
Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.16
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1655
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1
D1W / D3W Likelihood
2%
NCAA D1W
20%
NCAA D3W
78%
Club / Other
Based on 40 comparable players
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG
Pre-College Seasons
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | New Jersey Colonials 19U AAA | 19U-AAA-W | 56 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.214 | 0.0682 | 0.0682 |
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow
Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristen Truax | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG | 0.167 | Minnesota State |
| Jordan Jackson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG | 0.130 | Minnesota State |
| Kelsey Crow | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG | 0.160 | Penn State |
| Jessica Adolfsson | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG | 0.343 | Penn State |
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Riccobelli | 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG | 0.320 | SUNY Oswego | SUNYAC |
| Macy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG | 0.194 | Post | CHA-W |
| Ava Johansson | 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG | 0.130 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Hunter Reardon | 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG | 0.407 | Adrian | NCHA |
| Lily Anderson | 2022-23 · 0.43 PPG | 0.385 | Endicott | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.