IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Lefebvre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-15 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 2, Pick #46  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 22 1 2 3 0.136 0.0274 0.0274 0.0624 0.0624
2023-24 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 23 8 9 17 0.739 0.1486 0.1486 0.3380 0.3380
2024-25 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 25 20 34 54 2.160 0.4344 0.4344 0.9878 0.9878
2025-26 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 59 32 27 59 1.000 0.4913 0.4954 2.6696 2.6920
2026-27 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 4 4 3 7 1.750 0.8598 0.8598 4.6718 4.6718
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6768
Forward overall
#124
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jake Guentzel
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.