← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Armit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-14 Country: Canada
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 60 9 12 21 0.350 0.1720 0.1878 0.9344 1.0203
2026-27 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 6 3 1 4 0.667 0.3275 0.3275 1.7798 1.7798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33493
Forward overall
#178
Forward born in 2009
#996
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2016-17
0.55
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2015-16
0.55
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.