IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Armit Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-01-14 Country: Canada
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 60 9 12 21 0.350 0.1720 0.1878 0.9346 1.0205
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33044
Forward overall
#146
Forward born in 2009
#978
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Pavelek
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jared Fiegl
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Joe Connor
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.46
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Sam Colangelo
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
James Fisher
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
Dylan Hryckowian
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Cannizzaro
Hobart · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2012-13
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.