IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Filipe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-31 Country: USA
2016 · Round 3, Pick #67  ·  Carolina Hurricanes Carolina Hurricanes
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 56 19 17 36 0.643 0.3792 0.3937 1.9292 2.0032
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 30 9 13 22 0.733
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 37 8 11 19 0.513
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 31 5 8 13 0.419
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 38 9 12 21 0.553
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2016-17 · Northeastern
+64.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9669
Forward overall
#452
Forward born in 1997
#925
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Jackson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.