← New Search ↗ Social Card

Freddy Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-16 Country: USA
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rivers School NE-Prep 23 1 1 2 0.087 0.0175 0.0175 0.0398 0.0398
2023-24 Rivers School NE-Prep 30 4 14 18 0.600 0.1207 0.1207 0.2744 0.2744
2024-25 Rivers School NE-Prep 28 2 20 22 0.786 0.1580 0.1580 0.3593 0.3593
2025-26 Québec Remparts QMJHL 58 2 15 17 0.293 0.1440 0.1482 0.7825 0.8056
2026-27 Québec Remparts QMJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1228 0.1228 0.6674 0.6674
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8607
Defenseman overall
#1223
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Boston University
SHL 2025-26
0.05
actual FR PPG at Boston University
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2016-17
1.034 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.