← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mick Frechette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 27 3 4 7 0.259 0.0514 0.0514 0.1181 0.1181
2020-21 St. Paul’s School NE-Prep 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.0660 0.0660 0.1519 0.1519
2021-22 Dexter NE-Prep 25 3 8 11 0.440 0.0872 0.0872 0.2005 0.2005
2022-23 Dexter NE-Prep 31 3 5 8 0.258 0.0511 0.0511 0.1176 0.1176
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HockeyEast JR 32 1 2 3 0.094
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 25 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 7 0 2 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Boston University
+361.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18627
Defenseman overall
#3250
Defenseman born in 2003
#1086
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2009-10
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.