IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Clements Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 11 1 0 1 0.091 0.0305 0.0341 0.0841 0.0939
2001-02 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 53 4 5 9 0.170 0.0570 0.0599 0.1571 0.1652
2002-03 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 5 11 16 0.267 0.0895 0.0930 0.2468 0.2565
2003-04 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 55 5 8 13 0.236 0.0793 0.0755 0.2188 0.2083
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 24 7 0 7 0.292
2004-05 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 24 6 5 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2004-05 · Augsburg
+549.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#52023
Forward overall
#1453
Forward born in 1984
#2282
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Beaudoin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lane Boswell
Marian · 2006-07
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Gresh
Hobart · 2017-18
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.