| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Grande Prairie Storm | AJHL | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.091 | 0.0302 | 0.0337 | 0.0842 | 0.0940 |
| 2001-02 | Grande Prairie Storm | AJHL | 53 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.170 | 0.0563 | 0.0592 | 0.1574 | 0.1655 |
| 2002-03 | Grande Prairie Storm | AJHL | 60 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.267 | 0.0885 | 0.0920 | 0.2472 | 0.2569 |
| 2003-04 | Grande Prairie Storm | AJHL | 55 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.236 | 0.0784 | 0.0746 | 0.2191 | 0.2086 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Augsburg | D3 | — | SO | 24 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.292 |
| 2004-05 | Augsburg | D3 | — | FR | 24 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.458 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.