← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Clements Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-01-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 11 1 0 1 0.091 0.0302 0.0337 0.0842 0.0940
2001-02 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 53 4 5 9 0.170 0.0563 0.0592 0.1574 0.1655
2002-03 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 5 11 16 0.267 0.0885 0.0920 0.2472 0.2569
2003-04 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 55 5 8 13 0.236 0.0784 0.0746 0.2191 0.2086
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Augsburg D3 SO 24 7 0 7 0.292
2004-05 Augsburg D3 FR 24 6 5 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2004-05 · Augsburg
+556.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#51695
Forward overall
#1429
Forward born in 1984
#2639
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2006-07
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.