IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Gresh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 48 8 25 33 0.688 0.2306 0.2328 0.6362 0.6423
2017-18 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 48 3 18 21 0.438 0.1686 0.1625 0.6367 0.6136
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 18 6 4 10 0.556
2019-20 Hobart D1 SUNYAC SO 19 5 4 9 0.474
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 19 5 4 9 0.474
2018-19 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 11 1 0 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2018-19 · Alaska Fairbanks
-49.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7499
Defenseman overall
#1487
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Bottrell
Adrian · 2016-17
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Doyle
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Russo
Elmira · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.