IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Severyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-02 Country: USA
2007 · Round 6, Pick #186  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 31 3 3 6 0.194 0.1438 0.1478 0.7220 0.7419
2006-07 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 33 6 7 13 0.394 0.2928 0.2898 1.4698 1.4548
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Ohio State D1 CCHA-orig SR 37 7 5 12 0.324
2009-10 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 38 9 6 15 0.395
2008-09 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 33 9 3 12 0.364
2007-08 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 32 0 2 2 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2007-08 · Ohio State
-68.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28623
Forward overall
#945
Forward born in 1989
#36
in NTDP-U18

D1 Comparables

Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Caron
St. Michael's College · 2001-02
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Myles Abbate
Plymouth State · 2018-19
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.