IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Hegarty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-05-16 Country: USA
2008 · Round 4, Pick #113  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 43 1 2 3 0.070 0.0256 0.0289 0.0737 0.0831
2007-08 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 41 5 8 13 0.317 0.2357 0.2311 1.1832 1.1602
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 40 2 12 14 0.350
2010-11 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2009-10 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 33 1 7 8 0.242
2008-09 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 24 0 3 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2008-09 · Maine
-11.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6326
Defenseman overall
#989
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Gross
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.