← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Leddy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-03-20 Country: USA
2009 · Round 1, Pick #16  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 NTDP-U18 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.3716 0.3800 1.8657 1.9081
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 30 3 8 11 0.367
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2009-10 · Minnesota
+2.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Boston University (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ RPI (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.