IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Skoog Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 50 6 5 11 0.220 0.0872 0.0868 0.2310 0.2299
2004-05 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 50 6 13 19 0.380 0.1506 0.1424 0.3990 0.3772
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 — SR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 — JR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 — SO 29 0 9 9 0.310
2005-06 St. Norbert D3 — FR 25 1 5 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2005-06 · St. Norbert
+133.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41557
Forward overall
#1181
Forward born in 1984
#4527
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Degerness
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Robertson
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fleck
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.