IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Ebbole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Texarkana Bandits NAHL 50 2 9 11 0.220 0.0817 0.0824 0.2329 0.2349
2004-05 — NAHL 51 0 11 11 0.216 0.0801 0.0768 0.2284 0.2189
2005-06 Helena Bighorns NAHL 46 1 12 13 0.283 0.1049 0.0954 0.2992 0.2720
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 — SR 25 0 3 3 0.120
2008-09 UMass Boston D3 — JR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2007-08 UMass Boston D3 — SO 25 2 7 9 0.360
2006-07 UMass Boston D3 — FR 24 1 6 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2006-07 · UMass Boston
+251.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13477
Defenseman overall
#1360
Defenseman born in 1985
#5217
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Dronen
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew McCann
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Galloway Carroll
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.