← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Dronen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Moorhead USHS-MN 28 4 14 18 0.643 0.1731 0.1731 0.1562 0.1562
2020-21 Moorhead USHS-MN 21 11 10 21 1.000 0.2692 0.2692 0.2429 0.2429
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 55 5 8 13 0.236 0.0878 0.0902 0.2503 0.2572
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 56 9 22 31 0.554 0.2056 0.2012 0.5862 0.5736
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 59 12 25 37 0.627 0.2328 0.2167 0.6640 0.6180
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 26 3 9 12 0.462
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 23 3 7 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+141.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21330
Forward overall
#895
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2014-15
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2005-06
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.