IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dave Lewandowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Helena Bighorns NAHL 20 4 3 7 0.350 0.1286 0.1280 0.3694 0.3676
2004-05 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 51 10 18 28 0.549 0.2017 0.1907 0.5795 0.5478
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 22 6 5 11 0.500
2007-08 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 26 10 11 21 0.808
2006-07 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 28 10 23 33 1.179
2005-06 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 21 9 9 18 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2005-06 · Wentworth
+504.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30275
Forward overall
#876
Forward born in 1984
#2738
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Leo Bacallao
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.