IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonny Brodzinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — USHL 10 2 3 5 0.500 0.3074 0.3240 1.4731 1.5526
2011-12 — USHL 58 10 12 22 0.379 0.2332 0.2349 1.1175 1.1256
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 40 21 17 38 0.950
2013-14 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 38 21 20 41 1.079
2012-13 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-orig FR 42 22 11 33 0.786
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2012-13 · St. Cloud State
+239.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19479
Forward overall
#665
Forward born in 1993
#1930
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.26 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Duhamel
Norwich · 2003-04
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Cook
Babson · 2001-02
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Wright
Stonehill · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.