IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Duggie Lagrone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 53 2 3 5 0.094 0.0556 0.0588 0.2778 0.2938
2012-13 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 3 14 17 0.354 0.1258 0.1312 0.3719 0.3880
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 56 10 17 27 0.482 0.1712 0.1700 0.5062 0.5027
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Geneseo D1 — SR 28 7 20 27 0.964
2018-19 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 28 7 20 27 0.964
2017-18 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 27 6 19 25 0.926
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 16 0 3 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2015-16 · Colorado College
+28.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11171
Defenseman overall
#1471
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian DeLong
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cole
Trinity · 2011-12
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.