IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Stone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 6 11 17 0.333 0.1225 0.1397 3.0034 3.3090
2013-14 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 52 10 16 26 0.500 0.1837 0.2003 0.5278 0.5754
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 36 2 11 13 0.361 0.1327 0.1377 0.3811 0.3955
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 15 27 42 0.724 0.2660 0.2643 0.7643 0.7594
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Air Force D1 AHA SR 36 4 12 16 0.444
2018-19 Air Force D1 AHA JR 34 9 2 11 0.324
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA SO 39 4 9 13 0.333
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA FR 26 6 6 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · Air Force
+152.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24816
Forward overall
#1000
Forward born in 1996
#1959
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Facchini
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Hammermeister
Southern New Hampshire · 2003-04
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Felix Lamoureux
Hobart · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.