IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Hammermeister Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Fernie Ghostriders NAHL 53 8 25 33 0.623 0.2312 0.2260 0.6592 0.6443
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Southern New Hampshire D2 HockeyEast SR 24 18 19 37 1.542
2006-07 Southern New Hampshire D2 HockeyEast JR 27 21 26 47 1.741
2005-06 Southern New Hampshire D2 HockeyEast SO 24 14 17 31 1.292
2004-05 Southern New Hampshire D2 HockeyEast FR 28 20 14 34 1.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2004-05 · Southern New Hampshire
+527.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16562
Forward overall
#571
Forward born in 1984
#1324
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Doust
Fredonia · 2009-10
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sebastian Panetta
SUNY Geneseo · 2004-05
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morris
Elmira · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.