IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Doust Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 61 17 21 38 0.623 0.2081 0.2239 0.5783 0.6223
2008-09 Collingwood Blues OJHL 34 14 20 34 1.000 0.2794 0.2830 0.6901 0.6991
2009-10 Canmore Eagles AJHL 52 16 33 49 0.942 0.3147 0.3095 0.8747 0.8601
2010-11 Canmore Eagles AJHL 43 14 43 57 1.326 0.4428 0.4122 1.2306 1.1454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Fredonia D3 — SR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2013-14 Fredonia D3 — JR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2012-13 Fredonia D3 — SO 20 0 4 4 0.200
2011-12 Fredonia D3 — FR 19 7 6 13 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2011-12 · Fredonia
+115.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6968
Forward overall
#294
Forward born in 1990
#156
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anders Grongstad
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Fleurent
New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.