IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Fidler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Vernon Vipers BCHL 30 8 12 20 0.667 0.2569 0.2482 0.9702 0.9373
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Army D1 AHA SR 37 6 7 13 0.351
2017-18 Army D1 AHA JR 31 6 2 8 0.258
2016-17 Army D1 AHA SO 32 6 11 17 0.531
2015-16 Army D1 AHA FR 38 8 10 18 0.474
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2015-16 · Army
+122.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16992
Forward overall
#651
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Henningson
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dunner
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.