IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Lemirande Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Janesville Jets NAHL 56 6 5 11 0.196 0.0729 0.0771 0.2079 0.2198
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 54 9 12 21 0.389 0.1444 0.1454 — —
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 7 10 17 0.293 0.1866 0.1720 0.8783 0.8094
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Miami D1 NCHC SR 37 2 4 6 0.162
2016-17 Miami D1 NCHC JR 35 1 1 2 0.057
2015-16 Miami D1 NCHC SO 32 3 1 4 0.125
2014-15 Miami D1 NCHC FR 36 1 2 3 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2014-15 · Miami
-39.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28151
Forward overall
#1098
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Pickering
Concordia Wisconsin · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Albano
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.