IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Lindstrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 57 19 22 41 0.719 0.2555 0.2608 0.7552 0.7709
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 25 10 13 23 0.920
2016-17 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 24 12 10 22 0.917
2015-16 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 26 9 11 20 0.769
2014-15 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 29 5 11 16 0.552
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2014-15 · Amherst
+147.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17116
Forward overall
#661
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Gervais
Neumann · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Collins
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.