IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Davison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 48 2 10 12 0.250 0.0928 0.0951 0.2647 0.2712
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 37 1 6 7 0.189 0.0702 0.0688 0.2003 0.1964
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 53 2 15 17 0.321 0.1191 0.1103 0.3397 0.3145
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 2 16 18 0.667
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 2 20 22 0.710
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 28 6 13 19 0.679
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2017-18 · St. Norbert
+666.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12617
Defenseman overall
#1769
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Benshadle
Trinity · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Williams
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Minerva
Aurora · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.