IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Motor City Machine NAHL 57 15 15 30 0.526 0.1934 0.1867 0.5555 0.5364
2009-10 — NAHL 45 14 17 31 0.689 0.2531 0.2342 0.7271 0.6728
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 28 3 6 9 0.321
2012-13 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 18 1 5 6 0.333
2011-12 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 26 7 5 12 0.462
2010-11 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 22 2 8 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+146.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21403
Forward overall
#715
Forward born in 1989
#1511
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Glaesmer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
George Splichal
Bethel · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.