IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Theisen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1487 0.1439 0.7500 0.7260
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 5 10 15 0.268 0.0984 0.1015 0.2831 0.2919
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 49 15 21 36 0.735 0.2699 0.2663 0.7765 0.7662
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 19 27 46 0.821 0.3018 0.2814 0.8681 0.8094
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#19656
Forward overall
#778
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Davis
Neumann · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Faucher
Lake Forest · 2023-24
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.