← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Vesel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-14 Country: USA
2014 · Round 5, Pick #153  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Signed Professionally
Brynäs IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 49 33 38 71 1.449 0.8548 0.8105 4.3519 4.1265
2019-20 IF Björklöven Allsvenskan 42 8 23 31 0.738 1.8453 1.8453 6.9248 6.9248
2020-21 IF Björklöven Allsvenskan 51 18 28 46 0.902 2.2550 2.2550 8.4625 8.4625
2021-22 HV71 Allsvenskan 52 19 27 46 0.885 2.2115 1.9629 8.2992 7.3661
2022-23 HV71 SHL 46 5 9 14 0.304 0.7608 0.7050 3.9707 3.6793
2023-24 Brynäs IF Allsvenskan 44 12 24 36 0.818 2.0455 1.6454 7.6763 6.1747
2024-25 Brynäs IF SHL 48 4 9 13 0.271 0.6770 0.5440 3.5336 2.8392
2025-26 Brynäs IF SHL 51 3 6 9 0.176 0.4412 0.4412 2.3031 2.3031
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 36 11 21 32 0.889
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 39 14 21 35 0.897
2015-16 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 35 6 12 18 0.514
2014-15 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 39 8 15 23 0.590
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.81
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2014-15 · Nebraska Omaha
-26.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.