IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 11 10 21 0.362 0.1344 0.1444 0.3834 0.4118
2012-13 — NAHL 60 16 18 34 0.567 0.2104 0.2154 0.6000 0.6144
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 58 6 16 22 0.379 0.2415 0.2266 1.1366 1.0666
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 37 8 7 15 0.405
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 37 12 15 27 0.730
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 34 10 9 19 0.559
2014-15 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 36 6 5 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2014-15 · St. Lawrence
+60.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19269
Forward overall
#786
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.