IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Maloney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 53 10 10 20 0.377 0.1401 0.1463 0.3996 0.4173
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 21 7 7 14 0.667 0.4246 0.4071 1.9979 1.9157
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 36 15 10 25 0.694
2016-17 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 35 12 8 20 0.571
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 30 6 1 7 0.233
2014-15 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 34 1 4 5 0.147
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2014-15 · Ferris State
-43.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8232
Forward overall
#332
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niko Schoner
Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathew Thompson
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.