IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Canzoneri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1229 0.1441 0.5892 0.6911
2001-02 Tulsa Crude USHL 59 8 12 20 0.339 0.2084 0.2341 0.9988 1.1218
2002-03 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 0 5 5 0.098 0.0602 0.0639 0.2887 0.3063
2003-04 Youngstown Phantoms NAHL 56 15 25 40 0.714 0.2830 0.2888 0.7499 0.7652
2004-05 Youngstown Phantoms NAHL 53 15 43 58 1.094 0.4336 0.4209 1.1489 1.1152
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bentley D1 — SR 38 8 27 35 0.921
2007-08 Bentley D1 — JR 35 3 17 20 0.571
2006-07 Bentley D1 — SO 35 9 17 26 0.743
2005-06 Bentley D1 — FR 37 8 23 31 0.838
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2005-06 · Bentley
+165.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15590
Forward overall
#480
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.