← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Canzoneri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1384 0.6007 0.7045
2001-02 Tulsa Crude USHL 59 8 12 20 0.339 0.2000 0.2246 1.0182 1.1436
2002-03 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 0 5 5 0.098 0.0578 0.0613 0.2943 0.3123
2003-04 Youngstown Phantoms NAHL 56 15 25 40 0.714 0.2624 0.2678 0.7539 0.7693
2004-05 Youngstown Phantoms NAHL 53 15 43 58 1.094 0.4020 0.3902 1.1550 1.1211
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bentley D1 AHA SR 38 8 27 35 0.921
2007-08 Bentley D1 AHA JR 35 3 17 20 0.571
2006-07 Bentley D1 AHA SO 35 9 17 26 0.743
2005-06 Bentley D1 AHA FR 37 8 23 31 0.838
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2005-06 · Bentley
+186.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15609
Forward overall
#503
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.