IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean David Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Rockland Nationals CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 35 29 20 49 1.400 0.1292 0.1280 0.3206 0.3176
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 30 7 8 15 0.500 0.2039 0.1945 0.4019 0.3833
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canton D1 SUNYAC SO 22 4 12 16 0.727
2019-20 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 22 4 12 16 0.727
2018-19 Canton D1 SUNYAC FR 25 10 10 20 0.800
2018-19 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 25 10 10 20 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2018-19 · Canton
+456.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17901
Forward overall
#795
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Ciampichini
Elmira · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Greco
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Raphael Lajeunesse
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.