IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Ciampichini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — OJHL 46 10 9 19 0.413 0.1154 0.1231 0.2850 0.3041
2008-09 Collingwood Blues OJHL 49 31 27 58 1.184 0.3307 0.3359 0.8169 0.8297
2009-10 — OJHL 55 26 23 49 0.891 0.2489 0.2397 0.6148 0.5922
2010-11 — OJHL 46 14 30 44 0.957 0.2672 0.2449 0.6601 0.6051
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 27 6 12 18 0.667
2013-14 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 23 2 6 8 0.348
2012-13 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 22 6 4 10 0.455
2011-12 Elmira D3 — FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12317
Forward overall
#537
Forward born in 1990
#658
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Corry
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.900 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawson MacDougall
Hobart · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Karty
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.