IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Corry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-07-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 — AJHL 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0296 0.0304 0.0816 0.0838
2005-06 Calgary Royals AJHL 58 1 16 17 0.293 0.0983 0.0963 0.2712 0.2658
2006-07 Calgary Royals AJHL 52 6 29 35 0.673 0.2258 0.2109 0.6229 0.5817
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 23 2 11 13 0.565
2008-09 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 28 5 21 26 0.929
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 30 3 24 27 0.900
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2007-08 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+477.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12033
Defenseman overall
#1268
Defenseman born in 1986
#1443
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Carlson
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilson Northey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.