IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Corry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-07-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 — AJHL 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0295 0.0303 0.0819 0.0841
2005-06 Calgary Royals AJHL 58 1 16 17 0.293 0.0979 0.0959 0.2721 0.2666
2006-07 Calgary Royals AJHL 52 6 29 35 0.673 0.2248 0.2099 0.6248 0.5835
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 23 2 11 13 0.565
2008-09 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 28 5 21 26 0.929
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 30 3 24 27 0.900
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2007-08 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+480.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7906
Defenseman overall
#1087
Defenseman born in 1986
#1695
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Prescott
Nichols · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Place
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.