IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis Nanne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-18 Country: USA
2012 · Round 6, Pick #188  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Penticton Vees BCHL 45 19 22 41 0.911 0.3510 0.3608 1.3259 1.3630
2013-14 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 37 4 5 9 0.243 0.1435 0.1373 0.7304 0.6991
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 RPI D1 ECAC — 35 3 8 11 0.314
2015-16 RPI D1 ECAC — 40 6 17 23 0.575
2014-15 RPI D1 ECAC — 31 5 5 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2014-15 · RPI
+66.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24353
Forward overall
#949
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Caprio
Becker · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Mueller
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Olitch
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.